Résumé:
Therefore, it was hypothesized that the more learners are exposed
to pragmatic knowledge, the more their pragmatic competence is developed, and they will
be able to use various politeness strategies when expressing disagreement. Data were
collected from 100 English students from two levels (second year license and first year
master). When identifying disagreement expressions from responses, the taxonomy of
Muntigl and Turnbull (1998) was used, and when identifying politeness strategies, Brown
and Levinson’s (1987) model of politeness strategies was followed. The results showed
that students from both levels used politeness strategies when expressing disagreement.
Besides, the interlocutors’ social distance and power differences also found to influence
the use of politeness strategies when disagreeing. The findings of this study revealed also
that there was a development in the use of politeness strategies but the difference between
the two levels was not significant.